Skip to main content

Novo rejects calls to pull Victoza from US market

Novo Nordisk has stood up on the side of Victoza after persuasive US buyer bunch Public Resident required the diabetes medication to be removed.

Public Resident has asked the US Food and Medication Organization to quickly eliminate Victoza (liraglutide) from the market "since it puts patients at higher gamble of thyroid disease, pancreatitis, serious hypersensitive responses and kidney disappointment that offset any recorded clinical advantage". The backing bunch guarantees that the once-everyday human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) simple "is the main medication endorsed by the FDA or in the endorsement pipeline that causes thyroid C-cell growths in the two genders of rodents and mice, doing as such at drug openings like those found in individuals taking the suggested portion - a striking admonition sign".

Additionally, in the initial 17 months of Victoza being available, 200 patients were determined to have intense pancreatitis, as per Public Resident's audit of the FDA's antagonistic occasion data set. Since just 10% of cases are accounted for, "possibly upwards of 2,000 patients or more have experienced an excruciating and serious result because of taking Victoza", the gathering claims.

Sidney Wolfe, overseer of Public Resident's Wellbeing Exploration Gathering, said that "the FDA's regular answer for serious security issues related to new medications is wild: the organization basically depicts the dangers in the medication name and expectations that doctors and patients will focus".

That's what he noticed "an ever increasing number of individuals are taking this medication, and more individuals are encountering serious medical issues accordingly. Obviously, the FDA's admonition framework isn't adequate. The medication ought to be removed the market." Exactly 150,000 remedies for Victoza are currently being filled every month, which converts into 2,000,000 per year.

Anyway the Danish drugmaker rejects Public Resident's attestation. It takes note of that when it endorsed Victoza quite a while back, the FDA had before it "a lot of information, remembering clinical preliminaries for almost 4,000 patients".

As a feature of its typical interaction, Novo says the organization "painstakingly surveyed the entirety of the information and supported Victoza with marking that illuminates doctors and individuals with diabetes about the proper utilization of the item". In the a long time since endorsement, Novo says it has kept on working intimately with the FDA and the clinical local area and "our involvement with those two years doesn't uphold the Public Resident call to deny patients of the advantages of Victoza.

To be sure, Novo noticed that simply last week, it got an item name update for Victoza to incorporate information showing its predominant viability when contrasted and Merck and Co's opponent medication Januvia (sitagliptin). The company's central science official Mads Krogsgaard Thomsen let Reuters know that Public Resident had alluded to old information from concentrates on mice and rodents which had no importance to the utilization of Victoza in people.

He proceeded to say that "we expect no ramifications for Victoza from Public Resident's request. There isn't anything in it."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ozempic Litigation Update: Brazil Court Confirms 2026 Patent Expiry Litigation Update: Brazil Court Confirms 2026 Expiry for Ozempic Patents Posted on December 18, 2025 The global battle over GLP-1 receptor agonist patents has reached a critical milestone in South America. In a decisive move that will reshape the obesity and diabetes market, Brazilian courts have effectively confirmed that the patent exclusivity for semaglutide (the active ingredient in Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelsus) will end in March 2026 . For pharmaceutical investors, patients, and generic manufacturers, here is the breakdown of the recent litigation landscape in Brazil. The Core Decision: Extension Denied Novo Nordisk, the manufacturer of Ozempic, had sought to extend the validity of its Brazilian patents beyond the standard 20-year term. Their argument was...
Sun Pharma vs. Novo Nordisk: Semaglutide Litigation Update (Dec 2025) The Battle for Semaglutide: Novo Nordisk vs. Sun Pharma By Pharma Insights | Updated: December 9, 2025 | Reading Time: 3 Mins The race to capture the lucrative market for Semaglutide generics has intensified in India. As of December 2025, the Delhi High Court is witnessing a flurry of legal activity involving Danish giant Novo Nordisk and Indian generic major Sun Pharmaceutical Industries . 🚨 Key Update (Dec 9, 2025): Novo Nordisk has filed a fresh plea seeking to restrain Sun Pharma from dealing in the Semaglutide compound. 1. The Core Dispute At the heart of this litigation is Indian Patent No. 262697 . Novo Nordisk, the innovator behind Ozempic and Wegovy, is seeking a permanent injunction to prevent Sun Pharma from manufacturing, selling, or exporting the active p...
Litigation Update: Dr. Reddy's vs. Novo Nordisk (Semaglutide) Litigation Update • December 12, 2025 Delhi High Court Clears Dr. Reddy's for Semaglutide Exports: Refuses Novo Nordisk Stay In a significant development for the Indian pharmaceutical sector, the Delhi High Court (Division Bench) has today refused to stay a Single Judge's order permitting Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories (DRL) to manufacture and export Semaglutide. This ruling comes as a setback for Danish pharma giant Novo Nordisk , the patent holder of the blockbuster drugs Ozempic and Wegovy , which had sought to completely block DRL from manufacturing the drug in India. ⚖️ The Verdict at a Glance The Decision: The Division Bench (Justices C. Hari Shankar & O.P. Shukla) upheld the Single Judge's interim order. The Winner (Today): Dr. Reddy’s Laborator...